Methodology
Convergence Engine
100,000 adversarial AI perspectives across 8 worldviews (Western Biomedical, Traditional Medicine, Systems Biology, Evolutionary, Microbiome, Pharmacology, Neuroscience, Clinical). Finds where diverse analytical frames agree.
Crucible Debate
3 rounds of adversarial attack/defense with confidence scoring. A neutral judge evaluates surviving arguments, destroyed claims, and final verdict. Only consensus that survives hostile scrutiny makes the report.
Evidence Engine
Every claim is tested against real published literature from PubMed, Semantic Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Europe PMC. Evidence pyramid scoring weights systematic reviews highest. Active falsification attempts to break findings.
These reports are AI-generated research analysis. They are not medical advice, investment advice, or peer-reviewed publications. The convergence engine synthesizes AI perspectives — not human expert opinion. Evidence grounding uses automated literature retrieval and classification. Always consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on these findings.